|
Hey Reader, Dr Karl here. The part that matters most: where they deviate. When your data sits where the pattern says it shouldn't for someone with your profile, that's not noise. That's the signal — the thing worth chasing. A reference range can never show you that, because a reference range compares you to everyone. I compare your lab results to each other NOT TO A GENERIC RANGE for that single lab test. My glucose is in the pre-diabetic range. Notice the different patterns between Non IR (non insulin resistant) and IR-people (insulin resistant) groups. They have completely separate patterns .... How's that possible? "Set against people like me, my pattern lands squarely in the non-insulin-resistant group; that 'pre-diabetic' glucose isn't what it looks like" One more thing worth mentioning. This past year I wrote two books on exactly this — how to read the relationships in your own Lab work instead of chasing one value at a time. The thinking on the table is now written down. Another book is on the way for even more granular lab data pattern interpretation to aid you in your pursuit of understanding your health. I'll send a couple more notes in the coming weeks on what these overlays reveal. If you already want your numbers read against the dataset again with new lab work, just reply. I read every reply myself. To your health, Links to our published books are on our website |
Hey Reader, Dr Karl here. Flat and boring. If you have ever worn a continuous glucose monitor, you already know what I am about to show you, and you probably did not know it was the point. Four years ago her CGM trace was jagged. Peaks, drops, more peaks. Today it is a low flat line that barely moves all day. Flat and boring. That is the target. I have been saying it since before CGMs were fashionable, and I still say it. Put two people in front of the same ice cream cone. Both spike. But the...
Hey Reader, Dr Karl here. Nine point six. That is where her fasting insulin sat four years ago. On a Labcorp range runs 2.6–24.9 µIU/mL so 9.6 prints without a flag. Nobody called. Nothing was said.Four years later it is 3.4.Her glucose came down 16 points, from 108 to 92. Her CRP fell from 3.6 to 0.47, which is an 87 percent drop. She was 35 pounds over her ideal body weight and she is now 24. No medication for any of it. She takes progesterone for a twenty-year history of endometriosis,...
Hey Reader, Dr Karl here. It shows up in the data, and it's the opposite of what most people track. When I plot my clients by age, something shows up that I didn't go looking for. The older people in my data — the ones still healthy, still going — have a much lower fasting insulin. Not lower cholesterol. Not lower weight, particularly. Big difference between fasting Insulin levels between Insulin Resistant people versus Non Insulin Resistant ones. Lower insulin. The same pattern shows up in...