One break is a question. Three are a finding.


Hey Reader, Dr Karl here.

What I think is happening, and what I cannot prove.
I ruled things out before I landed anywhere.

Was her blood sugar getting worse? No. ​
Glucose fell 16 points over the four years and direct monitoring agreed.

Was she iron deficient, which genuinely does distort A1c? No. ​
Serum iron fell from 105 to 85, but ferritin nearly doubled, 160 to 288.
That is not depletion.

Was it a lipid shift? No. ​
HDL went 58, 63, 76, 64. It wandered and came back.
It cannot explain a one-directional four-year move.

Did she gain weight?
The opposite. Eleven pounds off.

So what did move together?

Her red blood cell count fell, 4.91 to 4.5 million.
Her hemoglobin fell, 15.2 to 14.1.
Her hematocrit fell, 46.4 to 43.6.
And her A1c rose.

Three independent markers, all pointing the same way, in the same person, over the same four years.

My read: her red cells are living longer. ​
A cell that survives longer spends more time in circulation collecting glucose,
so each one carries more glycation even though her blood sugar went down.
​
And when cells last longer, the body needs fewer replacements, so the count drifts down.
Fewer cells, each carrying more.

Now the honest part. I cannot prove this in her.

What is not circumstantial is the mechanism. ​
A 2023 review in Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics states plainly that A1c is subject to distortions related to altered red blood cell properties, including changes in cellular lifespan, and that the ordinary variation between people is large enough to alter clinical interpretation. ​
​
​That is their language, not mine.
I found it in one woman's labs before I found it in the literature.

One break is a question.
Three pointing the same way
is a finding. Full Story video Here.

~Dr. Karl Goldkamp
Keto Naturopath

Link to our books

​
Become a client. It's life changing coaching ​

Salamander Bay LLC

Read more from Salamander Bay LLC

Hey Reader, Dr Karl here. The chart says her average glucose was 117 to 137Here's what happens when the formula meets the actual measurement. There is a chart in every endocrinology office that converts your A1c into an estimated average glucose. It is printed on lab reports. It gets quoted back to patients as though it were a measurement. A person with an A1c reading of 5.7 to 6.4, that chart says your average glucose should be between 117 and 137 mg/dL. Assumed equivalence between A1c and...

Hey Reader, Dr Karl here. A1c tracks glucose beautifully, in only one group of people. A1c tracks glucose tightly in insulin resistant people. In everyone else it barely tracks at all. Two groups. One line is steep. The other is almost flat.That is one sentence and it undoes most of what A1c gets used for. Glucose verses Hemoglobin A1c Red line is the insulin resistant group. Steep. As glucose rises, A1c rises with it, more or less the way the textbook promises. Green line is everyone else....

Hey Reader, Dr Karl here. A1c is not a glucose test. It is a protein test. It measures the percentage of your hemoglobin that has glucose stuck to it. Hemoglobin lives inside red blood cells. A1c has two inputs, not one: 1. how much glucose is in your blood, and 2. how long your red cells stay Nobody tells you about the second one. Here is a client. Four years of work. Fasting insulin down 65%, from 9.6 to 3.4. Glucose down 16 points, from 108 to 92. CRP down 87%, from 3.6 to 0.47. Eleven...